**Concern: Fairness of the Whitelist Created by Proposal 125**
A governance proposal on Aquarius raises fairness concerns about Proposal 125's whitelist mechanism, which requires roughly 6-10 billion ICE in voting power for entry. The core concern: only large holders and whale-controlled delegations can realistically decide who gains access, creating barriers for smaller or newer projects.
Proposal 148 on Aquarius questions the fairness of Proposal 125's whitelist system. The mechanism requires approximately 6-10 billion ICE in voting power for entry, a threshold the proposal argues effectively concentrates decision-making among large token holders and whale-controlled delegations. The author raises a structural fairness question: does the current design truly serve the broader community, or does it unintentionally favor those with concentrated influence? The proposal does not challenge any specific past decisions but calls for community reflection on whether this governance mechanism is the fairest and most transparent way to manage access.
