Lumen Loop
All news
Articlestellar.orgCaroline Young5y ago

Custodial vs. non-custodial apps: which side are you on?

Stellar ecosystem leaders debate custodial vs. non-custodial key management approaches in a roundtable discussion, exploring how CAP-27 and SEP-30 support different solutions and which the SDF should prioritize for financial inclusion and adoption.

WalletsSecurityFinancial Inclusion
Lumen Loop's take

The Stellar Development Foundation hosted a roundtable with ecosystem partners including DSTOQ, Saldo, and SatoshiPay to discuss whether custodial or non-custodial solutions better serve the Stellar ecosystem. Non-custodial solutions uphold financial sovereignty and reduce regulatory overhead, enabling faster product iteration. Custodial solutions improve user experience and accessibility for non-technical audiences, particularly in emerging markets. The discussion revealed that the optimal approach depends on target audience: crypto-native users benefit from non-custodial solutions, while mainstream users prioritize ease of use. Recent Stellar protocol developments like CAP-27 (multiplexed accounts) and SEP-30 (account recovery) enable both approaches, though infrastructure gaps remain. Participants suggested hybrid solutions combining both models could work effectively with proper legal frameworks and key recovery mechanisms.

Mentioned projects
1 project linked
S
Stellar Development FoundationInfrastructure & Services
Audited
InfrastructureCommunity

The Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) is a non-profit organization that supports the development and growth of the Stellar ne…

View →